ON EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PROCESS OF ADVANCED OXIDATION

  • Anna I. Kulebiakina Scientific and Production Enterprise "Melitta"
  • Valeriya N. Dubrovina D. I. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
  • Sergey G. Kireev Scientific and Production Enterprise "Melitta"
  • Natal’ya A. Ivantsova D. I. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
  • Sergey G. Shashkovskiy Scientific and Production Enterprise "Melitta"
Keywords: EEO parameter, cost, advanced oxidation processes, phenol

Abstract

The EEO parameter is commonly used as a figure-of-merit of ultraviolet-based advanced oxidation processes (UV AOPs). It represents the energy input into the UV AOPs that can achieve an order of magnitude decrease in the target contaminant concentration in a unit volume. This paper focuses on factors, that influence on the EEO parameter and should be reported with it to compare the efficiency of different reactors or UV AOPs: the identity and concentration of the target pollutant, as well as the concentration of scavengers; the amount of hydrogen peroxide or other oxidizing agent, source of UV radiation etc. Decays of phenol, sodium dodecyl sulfate and petroleum products in UV AOP were used to show how various conditions affect on the EEO parameter. The studies were carried out on model solutions with an initial concentration of pollutants of 10 mg/l. As a source of ultraviolet radiation, a pulsed xenon lamp was used. It has a continuous emission spectrum in the range of 200 – 1000 nm, the average energy consumption was about 200 W, the radiation energy in the range of 200–300 nm was 2.7 J. Hydrogen peroxide was used as an oxidizing agent, it concentration varied from 10 to 340 mg/L. The modified parameter of UV AOP efficiency is proposed. It considers electrical energy input with reagents consumption. It is proposed to express the costs of the oxidant in physical values and include them in the modified parameter with a weighting factor.

For citation:

Kulebiakina A.I., Dubrovina V.N., Kireev S.G., Ivantsova N.A., Shashkovskiy S.G. On evaluation of the efficiency of the process of advanced oxidation. ChemChemTech [Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.]. 2022. V. 65. N 11. P. 104-110. DOI: 10.6060/ivkkt.20226511.6655.

References

Parsons S. Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water and Wastewater Treatment. London: IWA Publ. 2004. 386 p.

Bolton J.R., Valladares J.E., Zanin J.P., Cooper W.J., Nickelsen M.G., Kajdi D.C., Kurucz W. Figures-of-Merit for Advanced Oxidation Technologies: A Comparison of Homogeneous UV/H2O2, Heterogeneous UV/TiO2 and Elec-tron Beam Processes. J. Adv. Oxid Technol. 1998. V.3. N 2. P. 174-181. DOI:10.1515/jaots-1998-0211.

Keen O., Bolton J., Litter M., Bircher K., Oppenländer T. Standard reporting of Electrical Energy per Order (EEO) for UV/H2O2 reactors. Pure Appl. Chem. 2018. V. 9. P. 1487-1499. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2017-0603.

Popova S.A., Matafonova G.G., Batoev V.B. Generation of radicals in ferrous-persulfate system using KrCl excilamp. ChemChemTech [Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn.Zaved. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol.]. 2019. V. 62. N 5. P. 118-123. DOI: 10.6060/ivkkt.20196205.5819.

Stephen R. Cater, Mihaela I. Stefan, James R. Bolton, and Ali Safarzadeh-Amiri. UV/H2O2 Treatment of Methy tert-Butyl Ether in Contaminated Waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000. V. 34. P. 659-662. DOI: 10.1021/es9905750.

Manoj P Rayaroth, Charuvila T Aravindakumar, Noor S Shah, Grzegorz Boczkaj. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based wastewater treatment - unexpected nitration side reactions - a serious environmental issue: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022. V. 430. P. 133002. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133002.

Luis A.M., Lombrana J.I., Menendez A., Sanz J. Analysis of the Toxicity of Phenol Solutions Treated with H2O2/UV and H2O2/Fe Oxidative Systems. I&EC. 2011. V. 50. N 4. P. 1928-1937. DOI: 10.1021/ie101435u.

Goldstein S., Aschengrau D., Diamant Y., Rabani J. Photolysis of Aqueous H2O2: Quantum Yield and Applica-tions for Polychromatic UV Actinometry in Photoreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007. V. 41. N 21. DOI: 10.1021/es071379t.

Li Mengkai, Wen Dong, Qiang Zhimin, Kiwi John. VUV/UV light inducing accelerated phenol degradation with a low electric input. RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. N 13. P. 7640–7647. DOI: 10.1039/c6ra26043h.

Gonopol'sky A., Shashkovskiy S., Goldstein Y., Kireev S., Volosatova A., Kulebyakina A. Pulse Рhotochemical Decomposition of Phenol in Wastewater. Ekolog. Ind. Ross. 2020. V. 24. N 2. P. 22-27 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2020-2-22-27.

Kireev S.G., Arkhipov V.P., Shashkovsky S.G., Kozlov N.P. Measurement of spectral and energy characteristics of pulsed radiation sources of continuous spectrum. Photonics Russia. 2017. V. 8. N 68. P. 48-56. DOI: 10.22184/1993-7296.2017.68.8.48.56.

Karmazinov F.V., Kostyuchenko S.V., Kudryavtsev N.N., Khramenkov S.V. Ultraviolet technologies in the modern world. Dolgoprudny: Intellect. 2012. 392 p. (in Russian).

Joseph J. Pignatello, Esther Oliveros, Allison MacKay. Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006. V. 36. P. 1-84. DOI: 10.1080/10643380500326564.

Balaram Kiran Avasarala, Siva Rao Tirukkovalluri, Sreedhar Bojja. Photocatalytic degradation of monocroto-phos pesticide—an endocrine disruptor by magnesium doped titania. J. Hazard Mater. 2011. V. 186. P. 1234–1240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.132.

Kireev S.G., Shashkovskiy S.G., Tumashevich K.A., Abakumov A.V. Energy efficiency calculation of gas-discharge flash lamps. Nauch.-Tekhn. Vestn. Inform. Tekhnol., Mekhaniki Optiki. 2020. V. 20. N 1. P. 45-51 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17586/2226-1494-2020-20-1-45-51.

Bolton J., Linden K. Standardization of Methods for Fluence (UV Dose) Determination in Bench-Scale UV Experiments. J. Environ. Eng. 2003. V. 129. P. 209-215. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:3(209).

Jin S., Mofidi A.A., Linden K.G. Polychromatic UV Fluence Measurement Using Chemical Actinometry, Biodosimetry, and Mathematical Techniques. J. Environ. Eng. 2006. V. 132. P. 831-841. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:8(831).

Levichev N.A., Ershov B.G. Actinometric Measurement of Fluence with Allowance for Spectral Distribution of a Polychromatic Radiation Source. High Energy Chem. 2019. V. 53. N 3. P. 191-197. DOI: 10.1134/S0018143919030123.

PNDF (Russian: ПНДФ) 14.1:2.104-97 Method for measuring the mass concentration (total) of volatile phenols in samples of natural and treated wastewater by the accelerated extraction-photometric method without stripping. 1997. Moscow. 24 p. (In Russian).

PNDF (Russian: ПНДФ) 14.1:2.258-10 Methodology for performing anion mass concentration measurements. C (in Russian).

GOST (Russian: ГОСТ) 51797-2001. Drinking water. Method for determining the content of petroleum products, Moscow: Gosstandart of Russia. 2001. Moscow. 16 p. (In Russian).

Marchenko Z. Photometric determination of elements. M.: Mir. 1971. 501 p. (in Russian).

Published
2022-10-20
How to Cite
Kulebiakina, A. I., Dubrovina, V. N., Kireev, S. G., Ivantsova, N. A., & Shashkovskiy, S. G. (2022). ON EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PROCESS OF ADVANCED OXIDATION. ChemChemTech, 65(11), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.6060/ivkkt.20226511.6655
Section
ECOLOGICAL PROBLEMS of Chemistry and Chemical Technology